User:Maker: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Topological_naming_problem]] |
[[Topological_naming_problem]] |
||
I will also hope that sometimes one of the largest impediments for designing threads in FC will be eliminated: |
|||
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - PartDesign workbench. Feature Hole: correct functionality of bore depth according to ISO 6410–1 standard]] |
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - PartDesign workbench. Feature Hole: correct functionality of bore depth according to ISO 6410–1 standard]] |
||
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - normative correct simplified presentation of cross section in Techdraw according to ISO 6410–1 standard]] |
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - normative correct simplified presentation of cross section in Techdraw according to ISO 6410–1 standard]] |
Revision as of 06:36, 29 August 2020
I will hope that sometimes the hardest critical aspect in FC will be solved:
Topological_naming_problem
I will also hope that sometimes one of the largest impediments for designing threads in FC will be eliminated:
Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - PartDesign workbench. Feature Hole: correct functionality of bore depth according to ISO 6410–1 standard Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - normative correct simplified presentation of cross section in Techdraw according to ISO 6410–1 standard