User:Maker: Difference between revisions

From FreeCAD Documentation
No edit summary
(Removed links to obsolete Wished_tools page.)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

=== Motivation ===
=== Motivation ===
FreeCAD is FUN !
FreeCAD is Fun !<br>
...To contribute that an open source program is put alongside the established program manufacturers (such as: (such as: Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk, Inc., etc.), to extend the functionality, to enlarge the field of application, to constantly improve the program...
...To contribute that an open source program is put alongside the established huge program manufacturers (such as: Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk, Inc., ptc, etc.). <br>
To extend the functionality, to enlarge the field of application, to enlarge the user base, to constantly improve FreeCAD...


=== Features I'd like to see ===
=== Features I'd like to see ===
I will hope that sometimes the critical aspect in FC will be solved (the hardest):
I will hope that sometimes the critical aspect in FC will be solved (the hardest):
[[Topological_naming_problem]]
[[Topological_naming_problem]]

I will also hope that sometimes one of the largest impediments for designing threads in FC will be eliminated:
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - PartDesign workbench. Feature Hole: correct functionality of bore depth according to ISO 6410–1 standard]]
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing *Thread - normative correct simplified presentation of cross section in Techdraw according to ISO 6410–1 standard]]

Latest revision as of 20:22, 3 March 2022

Motivation

FreeCAD is Fun !
...To contribute that an open source program is put alongside the established huge program manufacturers (such as: Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk, Inc., ptc, etc.).
To extend the functionality, to enlarge the field of application, to enlarge the user base, to constantly improve FreeCAD...

Features I'd like to see

I will hope that sometimes the critical aspect in FC will be solved (the hardest):

          Topological_naming_problem