User:Maker: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Removed links to obsolete Wished_tools page.) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Motivation === |
|||
⚫ | |||
FreeCAD is Fun !<br> |
|||
...To contribute that an open source program is put alongside the established huge program manufacturers (such as: Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk, Inc., ptc, etc.). <br> |
|||
To extend the functionality, to enlarge the field of application, to enlarge the user base, to constantly improve FreeCAD... |
|||
=== Features I'd like to see === |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Topological_naming_problem]] |
[[Topological_naming_problem]] |
||
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing Thread - PartDesign workbench. Feature Hole: correct functionality of bore depth according to ISO 6410–1 standard]] |
|||
[[Wished_tools#2D drawing Thread - normative correct simplified presentation of cross section in Techdraw according to ISO 6410–1 standard]] |
Latest revision as of 20:22, 3 March 2022
Motivation
FreeCAD is Fun !
...To contribute that an open source program is put alongside the established huge program manufacturers (such as: Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk, Inc., ptc, etc.).
To extend the functionality, to enlarge the field of application, to enlarge the user base, to constantly improve FreeCAD...
Features I'd like to see
I will hope that sometimes the critical aspect in FC will be solved (the hardest):
Topological_naming_problem