User talk:Kunda1

Edit of Std_PrintPdf
Dear Kunda1,

Regarding the limitations: Can it be that you are confused by the limitations of the TechDraw DXF export?

You have added another link to the 3D_View. IMO having one on the page (Description) should be enough.

I have to admit that I am surprised by your edits (less than 5 minutes after my last change). The "In progress banner" is there for a reason. See here: https://wiki.freecadweb.org/WikiPages#Temporary_Flags

Regards, Roy.

Ideas for projects

 * Ickby's frameless UI layout experiment + Wiki page Ickbys_Frameless_UI
 * Better integration for FreeCAD and OpenSourceEcology
 * Buildbot framework for testing and generating binaries (especially for compiling experimental branches) #3259

Wiki Markup Cheatsheet

 * Test 1
 * Test 2

Edit of Part_Box
Dear Kunda1,

You have added that the Part_Box command was introduced in V0.14. This is not correct as the command already exists in V0.13. You probably only meant the different default label. IMO "Version=0.14" should be removed from GuiCommand.

Regards, Roy.

- Roy, Thanks for the heads-up, I think I was mislead by Part_Box. Should I change the GuiCommand to then? Kunda1 (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2020 (CET)

- Dear Kunda1,

I would remove Version=0.14 i.o.w. leave that version 'blank'. I don't now when Part_Box was introduced. I suppose it was earlier than V0.13. Compare Part_Cylinder.

EDIT: I see you have already changed and moved the content of the 'Version' paragraph. This is indeed better!

Regards, Roy. - Roy, I just re-edited and removed the 0.13 version to '?'. Thanks for your feedback. ;) Kunda1 (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2020 (CET)

Your edit to Std_ViewFitAll
I have undone your edit: https://wiki.freecadweb.org/index.php?title=Std_ViewFitAll&oldid=856803 Please, please do not create these ad-hoc inconsistencies. If you feel that this type of 'beautification' is required then you should do ALL pages belonging to the Std_Base workbench.

--Roy 043 (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)